Category Archives: methodology

Scanning apps, as of February 2026

On February 17, 2026, Professor Carly Goodman posted the following query on BlueSky: “crowdsourcing for my MA students: do you have a scanning app you like for archives? I used turboscan and save documents as pdfs within box/folder folder system in dropbox that mirrors the archive’s system–but is there something newer/better that you do and that works?”

Note: for my own latest batch of archival research, the lovely folks at George Mason University Special Collections set me up with their CZUR scanner, which I suspect works better than any phone-based app, and you don’t need to worry about battery life. PDFs get saved on your laptop.

Adobe Scan

Great OCR, but may require a paid, Pro account for best results.

CamScanner

Replies to query lacked details, but people seem to like it.

DocScan Pro

“lets you size photos on your phone, save as pdf, name according to your system, and export to cloud storage”

SwiftScan Pro

“can mimic the structure of the archive on your phone and automatically upload to dropbox or whatever”
“automatically converts images to OCR ready PDFs”

TurboScan

Goodman’s own choice. Also integrates with Dropbox.

A crowd-sourced list of methodology readings

On June 29, 2023, Professor Anne Foster of Indiana State University posted a query on Twitter: “For all the #twitterstorians , what’s your favorite methodology article? Particularly interested in ones that helped you “get it” in grad school. Looking for inspiration/readings for my “intro to grad study of history” class.”

Having received dozens of helpful suggestions, she compiled them in a bibliography, which she has graciously permitted me to reproduce here:

Continue reading

Why I can’t quit FileMaker Pro

Every few months history Twitter runs a thread about what software to use for note-taking. (See, e.g., threads recently started by Austin McCoy and J.Meléndez-Badillo.)

I wrote a whole chapter of The Princeton Guide to Historical Research on this topic, the gist of which is that historians have mostly abandoned our simple, easy-to-teach system based on 5 x 8 inch notecards, but we have yet to settle collectively on a computerized system to replace it.

Here are some more thoughts along those lines, and an explanation of the centrality of FileMaker Pro to my workflow for major projects.

Continue reading

5 Paragraphs in Defense of 5 Paragraphs

Inside Higher Ed has published my essay, “5 Paragraphs in Defense of 5 Paragraphs.” Among the other claims, I write that “five-paragraph essays also serve as building blocks for longer works. Three body paragraphs are enough to get students thinking about how one idea relates to the next, as well as to signal those relationships with appropriate transition words and phrases. Once students have mastered that skill, they are ready to assemble those blocks into larger structures.”

Readers may note that The Princeton Guide to Historical Research has five parts.

Critical reading of short texts

Even street signs can have meanings distinct from their explicit message.

Dan Malouff, “Here Are Five Street Signs That Really Mean the Street Design Is Wrong,” Greater Greater Washington (blog), November 1, 2017, https://ggwash.org/view/65399/five-street-signs-that-really-mean-the-street-design-is-wrong.

This sign really means we’re happy to throw a guilt trip at outsiders, but not happy to give our children a sidewalk.

Image by Magnolia677 on Wikipedia licensed under Creative Commons.